表面等离子共振(SPR)生物传感器 2011

Association of endogenous anti-interferon-α autoantibodies with decreased interferon-pathway and disease activity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Arthritis and rheumatism Morimoto AM, Flesher DT, Yang J, Wolslegel K, Wang X, Brady A, Abbas AR, Quarmby V, Wakshull E, Richardson B, Townsend MJ, Behrens TW
阅读原文 PDF DOI PubMed

组成图示

Association of endogenous anti-interf... 传感器构成示意图

点击图片查看大图 · 依据论文自动绘制

传感器类型

表面等离子共振(SPR)生物传感器

检测对象

抗干扰素-α自身抗体(anti-IFN-α autoantibodies, AIAAs);样品基质:SLE患者血清、RA患者血清、健康供体血清。

检测原理

CM5芯片表面羧基经EDC/NHS活化后,共价固定重组人IFNα4作为捕获抗原,参考通道固定人生长激素(somatropin),并用1 M乙醇胺封闭未反应位点。稀释血清流过芯片时,血清中抗IFNα IgG自身抗体(AIAA)与固定IFNα4特异性结合,使SPR响应单位(RU)增加;随后加入抗人IgG二级抗体结合AIAA,进一步放大响应。仪器记录结合曲线,净响应为IFNα4通道减去参考通道,以扣除非特异结合。AIAA浓度或亲和力越高,净RU越大;阳性判定基于健康对照均值加1.65 SD,且抗人IgG加入后至少增加100 RU。

检测灵敏度

原文未报告LOD、线性范围、灵敏度斜率或R^2。

效应效果

SPR免疫分析在49例SLE血清中检出13例(27%)AIAA阳性,25例健康对照基本无反应,25例RA中仅1例(4%)有反应性,提示对SLE相关AIAA具有较好选择性。与ELISA相比,SPR可检出更多低亲和力AIAA,文中称ELISA仅将约10%患者判为阳性,另有17%仅SPR阳性。AIAA阳性血清在体外抑制重组IFNα2活性59%–83%,健康对照约10%;也能中和PBMC来源内源性I型干扰素。AIAA阳性患者血清I型干扰素生物活性、ISM、BAFF、抗染色质/组蛋白/核糖体P抗体更低,SLEDAI更低,C3/C4更高,提示AIAA与较低疾病活动度相关。

传感器的构成

  • 基底/换能器:CM5传感器芯片(金表面羧基化)与BIAcore T100 SPR换能器,提供表面结合响应。
  • 化学活化层:EDC/NHS活化CM5羧基,形成氨基反应位点用于共价固定。
  • 捕获抗原层:重组人IFNα4固定于flow cell 2/3,作为AIAA捕获物;flow cell 1固定人生长激素(somatropin)作参考。
  • 封闭层:1 M乙醇胺封闭未反应位点,降低非特异结合。
  • 样品识别层:稀释血清中的抗IFNα IgG自身抗体(AIAA)与固定IFNα4结合。
  • 信号标记层:抗人IgG抗体(The Binding Site)结合AIAA,增加SPR响应。
  • 读出层:BIAcore T100记录响应单位(RU),以参考通道扣除非特异结合。

中文摘要

本研究旨在表征系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者内源性抗干扰素-α自身抗体(AIAA)阳性者的干扰素通路活性及血清学、临床特征。采用生物传感器免疫分析检测SLE(n=49)、类风湿关节炎(n=25)和健康对照(n=25)血清中的AIAA;用U937细胞报告基因法测定血清I型干扰素生物活性及AIAA中和活性;通过微阵列分析外周血干扰素调节基因表达,并用免疫分析检测BAFF、干扰素诱导趋化因子及其他自身抗体。结果显示,生物传感器免疫分析在27%的SLE血清中检出AIAA。无监督层次聚类将患者分为IFNlow和IFNhigh两组,两组在血清I型干扰素生物活性、干扰素调节基因表达、BAFF、抗核糖体P抗体、抗染色质抗体及AIAA状态上存在差异。多数AIAA阳性患者血清I型干扰素生物活性、下游干扰素通路活性及疾病活动度低于IFNhigh组;AIAA阳性血清在体外可有效中和I型干扰素活性。结论:SLE患者常携带AIAA,AIAA阳性者I型干扰素生物活性及下游通路活性降低,AIAA可能通过削弱IFN-α效应影响SLE临床过程。

英文摘要

OBJECTIVE: Numerous observations implicate interferon-α (IFNα) in the pathophysiology of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE); however, the potential impact of endogenous anti-IFNα autoantibodies (AIAAs) on IFN-pathway and disease activity is unclear. The aim of this study was to characterize IFN-pathway activity and the serologic and clinical profiles of AIAA-positive patients with SLE. METHODS: Sera obtained from patients with SLE (n = 49), patients with rheumatoid arthritis (n = 25), and healthy control subjects (n = 25) were examined for the presence of AIAAs, using a biosensor immunoassay. Serum type I IFN bioactivity and the ability of AIAA-positive sera to neutralize IFNα activity were determined using U937 cells. Levels of IFN-regulated gene expression in peripheral blood were determined by microarray, and serum levels of BAFF, IFN-inducible chemokines, and other autoantibodies were measured using immunoassays. RESULTS: AIAAs were detected in 27% of the serum samples from patients with SLE, using a biosensor immunoassay. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis identified 2 subgroups of patients, IFN(low) and IFN(high) , that differed in the levels of serum type I IFN bioactivity, IFN-regulated gene expression, BAFF, anti-ribosomal P, and anti-chromatin autoantibodies, and in AIAA status. The majority of AIAA-positive patients had significantly lower levels of serum type I IFN bioactivity, reduced downstream IFN-pathway activity, and lower disease activity compared with the IFN(high) patients. AIAA-positive sera were able to effectively neutralize type I IFN activity in vitro. CONCLUSION: Patients with SLE commonly harbor AIAAs. AIAA-positive patients have lower levels of serum type I IFN bioactivity and evidence for reduced downstream IFN-pathway and disease activity. AIAAs may influence the clinical course in SLE by blunting the effects produced by IFNα.